File No. 26 — Correctional Mental Health

When a case turns on how a facility treated someone in crisis, you need someone who has run that unit.

I spent 16 years administering mental health programs for seriously mentally ill incarcerated individuals. Now I help attorneys and reentry organizations evaluate whether a facility's care met the standard — and testify to it when it didn't.

Case SnapshotExhibit A
  • FieldCorrectional MH Admin
  • Experience16 Years
  • CredentialsPhD · MPA · BS CJ
  • PopulationSMI Incarcerated Adults
  • ScopePolicy · Standards of Care
  • Not ProvidedClinical Evaluation
16 YearsDirect correctional mental health program experience
PhD · MPAPlus a BS in Criminal Justice
SystemicDeliberate-indifference & standards-of-care litigation support
Not ClinicalProgram & policy expertise — evaluations stay with licensed clinicians
Exhibit B — Areas of Work

Three ways I support a case or a facility

Each track draws on the same foundation: two decades inside correctional mental health administration, not a single afternoon of chart review.

01 — Litigation Support

Expert Witness & Case Review

Record review, standards-of-care analysis, written reports, depositions, and trial testimony for defense, civil rights, and systemic litigation.

  • Medical/mental health record review
  • Standard-of-care & deliberate-indifference analysis
  • Written expert reports
  • Deposition & trial testimony
02 — Program Consulting

Program & Policy Review

Independent assessment of a facility's mental health program against accepted correctional standards, for counsel, oversight bodies, or agency leadership.

  • Policy & protocol review
  • Program administration audit
  • Systemic-risk assessment
  • Written findings & recommendations
03 — Institutional Training

Staff & CE Training

In-service workshops and CE-eligible curriculum on crisis intervention, suicide risk, documentation, and standards of care for corrections and reentry staff.

  • In-service workshops
  • CE certification series
  • Ongoing consulting retainer
  • Custom curriculum development
Exhibit C — Process

How a case moves from intake to testimony

The same sequence I'd expect if I were the attorney hiring outside expertise — no surprises once we're in front of a judge.

STEP 01

Intake call

A short conversation to confirm the case is a fit — the facility, population, and issues involved fall inside correctional mental health program administration, not clinical diagnosis.

STEP 02

Record review

Medical, mental health, and policy records are reviewed against accepted correctional standards of care, billed at an hourly rate agreed before work begins.

STEP 03

Written report

Findings are documented in a report suitable for filing — plain language first, technical citations second.

STEP 04

Deposition & testimony

Available for deposition and trial testimony, with prep time built into the engagement rather than billed as a surprise.

Exhibit D — Resources

Start with the guide before you need the expert

Two self-serve resources for attorneys and advocates who want a working understanding of correctional mental health before a case is even filed.

Digital Guide

Understanding Serious Mental Illness in Corrections

A practical guide for attorneys, advocates, and reentry professionals — what SMI looks like inside a facility, where care commonly breaks down, and the language to use in filings.

$27
View free preview →
Case Toolkit

The Correctional Mental Health Case Toolkit

Case screening checklist, records request template, standard-of-care red-flag guide, expert engagement letter, and a deposition prep question bank.

$97
See what's inside →
Exhibit E — Get Started

Have a case that hinges on the quality of care inside a facility?

Request a Case Consultation